tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5714045366168902489.post878796660170329834..comments2024-02-06T07:49:22.830-08:00Comments on Evidence Based EFL: Woo watch: Science / fiction mallingualhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13278408615407649532noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5714045366168902489.post-55519052833370077472018-12-17T17:29:32.322-08:002018-12-17T17:29:32.322-08:00good point. You are abolsutely right about most ls...good point. You are abolsutely right about most ls articles. <br /><br />I briefly looked into her references and the ones I saw did not use Learning styles in anything like the VAK sense (which is the main educational one). I would've looked into in more but really why bother? If she really wants to 'dismantle' this stuff good research would be much more effective. mallingualhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13278408615407649532noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5714045366168902489.post-49469477233291085562018-12-17T04:28:25.658-08:002018-12-17T04:28:25.658-08:00I'll add one further critique. Published artic...I'll add one further critique. Published articles that use learning styles as a construct are not articles on learning styles research. That is, they are not attempting to measure their existence. Instead, they take learning styles as a manifest, real construct and use it to measure other things. Those things, therefore, are being categorized and measured by something that may not exist.<br /><br />I have not looked carefully at her references, but if she is counting articles like these as support by learning styles scientists, her premise is even further undermined.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13483177011096902924noreply@blogger.com